Adsense
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
A New Year's Greeting
Kidding aside, I wish that you may have the courage of David, the meekness of Joseph, the faithfulness of Moses, the obedience of Abraham, the wisdom of Solomon, and the penis of Goliath! A prosperous 2009!!!
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 30/12/08 (2)
Bernama SMS 30/12/08 (4)
Bernama SMS 30/12/08 (3)
Bernama SMS 30/12/08 (2)
Bernama SMS 30/12/08
MalaysiaKini SMS 30/12/08
Monday, December 29, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 29/12/08
Sunday, December 28, 2008
Gray
Saturday, December 27, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 27/12/08
Friday, December 26, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 26/12/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 26/12/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 26/12/08
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 24/12/08 (3)
Christmas Wisecracks
Snowballs.
Merry christmas !
MalaysiaKini SMS 24/12/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 24/12/08
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 23/12/08 (4)
MalaysiaKini SMS 23/12/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 23/12/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 23/12/08
PHILIPPINES: Sixty two families of farmer face threats of losing land
Urgent Appeal Case: AHRC-UAC-267-2008
<http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/
2008>
22 December 2008
------------------------------
PHILIPPINES: Sixty two families of farmer face threats of losing land
ISSUES: Right to land; right to property; right to housing; right to
food; agriculture
------------------------------
Dear friends,
The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) writes with deep concern
over the plight of sixty two farming families who face the threat of
losing their land in the province of Bukidnon after they were
excluded as beneficiaries for land distribution despite the fact that
they have been farming the land for at least 15 years. Their names
were replaced with persons who have never cultivated the land.
CASE DETAILS: (According to information received from the Task Force
Detainees of the Philippines (TFDP-Mindanao))
The Don Carlos Bukidnon United Farmers Association, Incorporated
(DCBUFAI), where the 62 families affected farmers are attached, was
formerly the defunct BFI-Carlos Bukidnon Farmers Association. It was
first registered in 22 April 1997 with 224 members. After changing
their name, they had also obtained a new Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) registration no. H1999-00214.
However, their membership has reduced to 109, including the 62
families mentioned above who now face threats of losing the land they
cultivate and from which they get their means of subsistence.
Even before they became an association, these farmers had already
entered the landholdings of Bukidnon Farmers, Inc. (BFI) on
individual capacity from 1986. It lasted for succeeding years until
the management of the BFI had them recruited into planting corn and
other crops in between the coconut trees the BFI had planted
purposely to maintain its cultivation. But when the BFI close down
after having been sequestered, the farmers have not been given any
compensation.
At present, each of these farmers had been able to cultivate about
one hectare each. The period by which each of them had been
cultivating the land ranging from fifteen to twenty years
respectively which they planted sugarcane, corn and rice.
However, of the 109 members of farmer, it is learned that sixty-two
of them have not been included in the list as beneficiaries for land
distribution under the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Programme
(CARP), a law which provides distribution of land to landless
farmers, which is being implemented by the Department of Agrarian
Reform (DAR). This is despite them having been included in the list
during a pre-screening in 1996.
They were said to have been excluded from the list for reasons that
they were not in the original list which is not true. The reality
that the farmers have been actually possessing and since cultivating
the land for many years was also ignored. They, however, learned that
the new list of names of the beneficiaries recently issued are persons
who are either not residents of Don Carlos or have never cultivated
the land.
They have also learned that the land these farmers had been
cultivating have in fact already been covered by a Certificate of
Land Ownership Award (CLOA), which means the occupants have already
have the legal right to claim ownership under the CARP. However, they
only came to be aware of this until recently.
To affirm the farmer's claims, on 24 January 2000, the office of the
Barangay Reform Council (BARC) issued a certification which affirms
that the 62 families of farmers are residents of the place and has
since been cultivating the land reform for many yeas.
On 8 October 2008, the farmers filed a petition to have their names
included as beneficiaries with the regional officer of the Department
of Agrarian Reform (DAR), Region X, in Cagayan de Oro City. The
certification that the BARC has issued was also included in the
farmer's petition which the farmers filed.
Nine days later, October 17, John Maruhom, DAR regional director,
forwarded the farmers' petition to Norberto R. Amora, provincial
agrarian reform officer in South Bukidnon. The endorsement has had a
notation and called for the attention of Adones Obsioma, chairman of
the Task Force BFI, for him to evaluate and take appropriate action.
On 6 November 2008, the farmers once again followed-up their petition
at Obsioma's office. Though his secretary has already confirmed of
having received the DAR communication but she was not aware of what
action he had taken, if there is any. His secretary also could not
tell exactly when Obsioma would return to his office.
On 7 November 2008, they made another follow up again by going to the
office of the Municipal Agrarian Reform Office (MARO) but they were
told that Obsioma was on leave.
On 9 December 2008, they wrote a letter to John Maruhom, DAR regional
director, informing him that for several occasions that they made
follow-up with Obsioma's office they have not been able to meet him
and always been told by his secretary he is not around. This prompted
the farmers to proceed to several offices of DAR in Maramag and Don
Carlos municipalities respectively hoping they could meet Obsioma to
do follow-up on their case. However their efforts failed to show
substantial progress.
On 15 December 2008, the farmers were once again told that Obsioma
was in Manila. Thus, at the time this appeal is being written,
Obsioma is yet to take action into concluding the farmer's petition
to have their names included in the list of beneficiaries. Under the
law, only the beneficiaries of the CARP upon DAR's assessment could
have the possibility of owning the land they cultivating under the
land reform.
SUGGESTED ACTION:
Please write letters to concerned authorities, in particular the
Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR), requesting for their immediate
intervention into their farmers' plight. The farmers' petition should
be acted upon without delay and that inquiries into the irregularities
in the exclusion of the farmers are beneficiaries; and the inclusion
of the names of the persons who are not actually farmers.
The AHRC has also written letters to the UN Special Rapporteurs on
the right to food and on adequate housing calling for their
intervention.
To support this appeal, please click here:
<http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/
SAMPLE LETTER:
Dear ___________,
PHILIPPINES: Sixty two families of farmer face threats of losing land
Affected families: Sixty two families of farmers; residents of San
Roque and San Ramon, Don Carlos, Bukidnon; members of Don Carlos
Bukidnon United Farmers Association, Incorporated (DCBUFAI), an
organization of actual tiller farmers
Name of the responsible government agency: Department of Agrarian
Reform (DAR), the government agency responsible for implementation of
the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Programme (CARP)
Status of the case: The farmers have already filed a petition with
the DAR to have their names included as the beneficiaries for the
distribution of the land reform. However, the failure of Adones
Obsioma, chairman of the Task Force BFI, to evaluate and take
appropriate action to have the petition resolve promptly aggravated
the farmer's plight of facing the threats of losing the land.
I am writing to express my grave concern about the plight of the
sixty families of farmers mentioned above who faces threats of losing
the land where they have since been cultivating at least for 15 years.
It is extremely disappointing that these farmers, despite them having
actually possessed the land and cultivating them for at least 15
years, their names have not been included in the list of
beneficiaries for land distribution.
Instead, the name of persons who are either not residents of the
place and never actually cultivated the land were included in the
list of beneficiaries which is completely high questionable. I could
not comprehend why the farmers who are supposed to benefit this land
are in fact facing threats of being deprived or lose their land. Not
only did this procedures questionable but also legally incoherent.
The farmer's plight, too, had been aggravated by the government's
failure, in particular chairman of the Task Force BFI, Adones
Obsioma; and the Department of Agrarian Reform's (DAR) office' to
have the farmers' petition to have their names included in the list
of beneficiaries be resolved without delay.
I have learned that since November 6 of this year, the farmers could
either not locate Obsioma at his office for several occasion as they
make follow up for their petition. Also Obsioma also failed to take
immediate action to respond the DAR regional office endorsement in
Cagayan de Oro for him to take action on the petition. It is
disappointing that Obsioma have continuously fails perform duties he
is obliged of doing and is expected from him.
Apart from that, the expansion of a pineapple and banana plantation
in their area has aggravated the scenario that would lose their land
unless the government responsible in dealing with their case takes
prompt action. The lack of concern to have the farmer's plight
resolve promptly as what is being shown by the public officials is
unacceptable.
It is disappointing that these farmers have had to endure threats of
losing the land they cultivated which would eventually have a
tremendous effect in their families as they would lose their means of
subsistence.
I fail to comprehend that although details and the evidences in this
case have provided that these families of farmers should have had
benefited this land under CARP; however, in the implementation of
this programme is otherwise. And even though were DAR itself have
identified these farmers as beneficiaries during their initial
screening it fails to upheld these farmers right by failing to act on
their petition promptly.
I therefore urge you to take an effective and adequate action in this
case.
Yours sincerely,
--------------
PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:
1. Mrs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo
President
Republic of the Philippines
Malacanang Palace
JP Laurel Street, San Miguel
Manila 1005
PHILIPPINES
Fax: +63 2 736 1010
Tel: +63 2 735 6201 / 564 1451 to 80
E-mail: corres@op.gov.ph
2. Ms. Leila De Lima
Commissioner
Commission on Human Rights
SAAC Bldg., Commonwealth Avenue
U.P. Complex, Diliman
Quezon City
PHILIPPINES
Fax: +63 2 929 0102
Tel: +63 2 928 5655 / 926 6188
E-mail: chr.delima@yahoo.com
or mtm_rodulfo@yahoo.com
3. Datu Nasser C. Pangandaman, Al Hadj
Secretary
Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR)
Eliptical Road, Diliman
Quezon City 1104, Metro Manila
PHILIPPINES
Fax: +63 2 929 3088
Tel: +63 2 929 3460 / 930 0380
Email: busysquare@yahoo.com
4. John M. Maruhom, CESO, IV
Regional Director
Department of Agrarian Reform, Region X
Macaranhan, Carmen
Cagayan de Oro City
PHILIPPINES
Tel: +6388 723727/726 422
Fax: +63 88 858 2674
5. Mr. Norberto R. Amora, MPA
Provincial Agrarian Reform Officer II
Department of Agrarian Reform Provincial Office
South Bukidnon
PHILIPPINES
Tel: +63 88 8131 387
Thank you.
Urgent Appeals Programme
Asian Human Rights Commission (ua@ahrchk.org
)
2008>
<http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/
-----------------------------
Asian Human Rights Commission
19/F, Go-Up Commercial Building,
998 Canton Road, Kowloon, Hongkong S.A.R.
Tel: +(852) - 2698-6339 Fax: +(852) - 2698-6367
Heroes Season 3 : Villains
Monday, December 22, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 22/12/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 22/12/08
The Grumbling Chinese? The John Gandhi Ramblings...
Corruption : An Ordinary Joe's Take
It has been a lousy 2 weeks.
This time is different from the rest of the challenges that I have to face. My project is dragging because we were doing it the ‘right way’. We are behind because we don’t play money with a certain government department.
Yes I am talking about corruption in our government system. Government servants won’t move to help unless there’s something in it for them. No matter how disgusting it may be in the end, we all still would have to pay certain ‘consultation’ fees just so that we can keep up with project development.
Coming back to our project; well it seems that we have no choice but to speed things up and that means we have to finally play money. Or else nothing will move.
I was in a moral dilemma over this issue. I didn’t want to get involved with this fucking corrupt practices. I wanted to go about it through merit because my team and I are capable and efficient to get things moving.
But in Malaysia this will never happen. Government servants are now so entrenched with corrupt practices that corruption has become an institution in our country.
When running a business, a business leader has to consider and manage employees salaries, bank loan installments, office rentals, telephone, electricity and water bills etc, just to ensure that the business survives its daily rigors.
And the bastards from the government departments would also expect their share in forms of money, women and booze.
Even with the MACC and JAC bills passed in parliament, I still doubt that we would observe any real changes yet in the current administration.
So I have decided to play along with the current government practices with minimal involvement at least for a while. Too many commitments and lives are at stake and we have to press forward to complete this project.
Anyway that’s the plan. The rest I will leave for God to decide...
Saturday, December 20, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 20/12/08
Erecterius Trouserius
ERECTERIUS TROUSERIUS (Trouser Snake)
Description-Varies from pink to black, fangless with highly venomous spit that can cause prolonged swelling lasting 9 months. Size varies from 3 to 9 inches depending on subspecies. Usually found in bedrooms but is known to appear in unusual places from time to time. Attacks women in the lower frontal abdomenal area but on occasions is known to attack men in the lower posterior area also.
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 17/12/08 (4)
MalaysiaKini SMS 17/12/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 17/12/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 17/12/08
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 16/12/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 16/12/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 16/12/08
Monday, December 15, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 15/12/08 (3)
Bernama SMS 15/12/08 (2)
Bernama SMS 15/12/08 (2)
Bernama SMS 15/12/08
MalaysiaKini SMS 15/12/08
Saturday, December 13, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 13/12/08
Friday, December 12, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 12/12/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 12/12/08
Friday Night Laugh
Ku Din was puzzled as to why they took the RM50 but handed him back RM4.00 until one voter said, “Lima puloh tak seh. Amboh nak pat puloh neh.” (I don’t want 50. I want 46.)
Thursday, December 11, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 11/12/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 11/12/08
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 10/12/08 (3)
Bernama SMS 10/12/08
MalaysiaKini SMS 10/12/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 10/12/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 10/12/08
Tuesday, December 09, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 09/12/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 09/12/08
Friday, December 05, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 05/12/08 (4)
Bernama SMS 05/12/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 05/12/08 (3)
Bernama SMS 05/12/08
MalaysiaKini SMS 05/12/08 (2)
FW: MalaysiaKini SMS 05/12/08
Subject: MalaysiaKini SMS 05/12/08
From: jongandhi@gmail.com
Date: 05/12/2008 11:58 AM
5/12: EC: Nomination for Kuala Terengganu by-election will be Jan 6, polling day is on Jan 17. The campaign period will be 11 days./MKINI
Thursday, December 04, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 04/12/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 04/12/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 04/12/08
Fail! :D 6
see more pwn and owned pictures
see more pwn and owned pictures
see more pwn and owned pictures
see more pwn and owned pictures
see more pwn and owned pictures
Fail! :D
MalaysiaKini SMS 04/12/08
Bernama SMS 04/12/08
Wednesday, December 03, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 03/12/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 03/12/08 (2)
U-Turn
Bernama SMS 03/12/08 (2)
Bernama SMS 03/12/08
MalaysiaKini SMS 03/12/08
Tuesday, December 02, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 02/12/08 (4)
MalaysiaKini SMS 02/12/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 02/12/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 02/12/08
Monday, December 01, 2008
Bernama SMS 01/12/08 (3)
Bernama SMS 01/12/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 01/12/08 (2)
Bernama SMS 01/12/08
MalaysiaKini SMS 01/12/08
Saturday, November 29, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 29/11/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 29/11/08
Friday, November 28, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 28/11/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 28/11/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 28/11/08
MalaysiaKini SMS 27/11/08 (Delayed 3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 27/11/08 (Delayed 2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 27/11/08 (Delayed)
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 26/11/08
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Bernama SMS 25/11/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 25/11/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 25/11/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 25/11/08
Bernama SMS 25/11/08
Monday, November 24, 2008
Bernama SMS 24/11/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 24/11/08 (4)
MalaysiaKini SMS 24/11/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 24/11/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 24/11/08
Bernama SMS 24/11/08
Friday, November 21, 2008
Bernama SMS 21/11/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 21/11/08 (3)
Bernama SMS 21/11/08
MalaysiaKini SMS 21/11/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 21/11/08
Mobile Evolution And Beyond!
Thursday, November 20, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 20/11/08 (4)
Bernama SMS 20/11/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 20/11/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 20/11/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 20/11/08
Bernama SMS 20/11/08
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Bernama SMS 19/11/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 19/11/08 (3)
MalaysiaKin SMS 19/11/08 (2)
Bernama SMS 19/11/08
MalaysiaKini SMS 19/11/08
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Bernama SMS 18/11/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 18/11/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 18/11/08 (2)
Bernama SMS 18/11/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 18/11/08
Bernama SMS 18/11/08
Monday, November 17, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 17/11/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 17/11/08 (2)
Bernama SMS 17/11/08
MalaysiaKini SMS 17/11/08
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Who Is Tun?
Pak Lah was baffled. So, he e-mailed to KJ. KJ and his sidekicks had no clue either. Pak Lah then sent it to MCA, MIC, Gerakan. No one could solve it.
With no clue to the meaning, Pak Lah eventually turned to Tun Dr M for help. Within seconds Tun Dr M answered: "You are holding Anwar's message upside down!"
Political Jokes
General Musharraf, Dr Mahathir, Gloria Arroyo & Lee Kuan Yew were sitting in a train. The train goes through a tunnel and it gets completely dark for the next 8 seconds.Suddenly there is a loud kissing sound and then a slap !The train comes out of the tunnel.
Arroyo and Musharraf are seated across each other, both looking perplexed.
Mahathir, seated across LKY, is bent over holding his face, which is very red from an apparent big slap.
All of them remain diplomatic and nobody says anything.
Musharraf is thinking : ‘ These Malaysians are all crazy after Arroyo. Mahathir must have tried to kiss her in the tunnel. Very proper that she slapped him ! ‘
Arroyo is thinking : ‘ Mahathir must have moved to kiss me,
but kissed Musharraf instead and got slapped. ‘
Mahathir is thinking : ‘ Damn it, Musharraf must have tried to kiss Arroyo ;
she thought it was me and slapped me instead. Shit !! ‘
Lee Kuan Yew is thinking : ‘ If this train goes through one more tunnel,
I could make another kissing sound and slap Mahathir again !! ‘
Bernama SMS 16/11/08
Clearing The Air Over Sabah Gas
Q: There have been numerous questions raised about the oil and gas industries in Sabah, particularly the 500km multi-billion ringgit Kimanis-Bintulu gas pipeline project and the setting up of a petrochemical complex in Sabah. How do you deal with this?
A: We have to put this in perspective. I am only going to deal with facts because I am a technocrat. You have to go back to history. The oil and gas industry in Sabah started many years ago, even before the incorporation of Petronas. But Sabah has small resources and therefore small production. But it has been a producer for a long time. The oil and gas industry in Sabah was based in Labuan and this included the Labuan Crude Oil Terminal, Asian Supply Base and methanol plant. Labuan became a federal territory in 1984. But the development of oil and gas continued. The first methanol plant was developed by the Sabah Gas Industries which was bailed out by Petronas in 1992. Even though Labuan became a federal territory, Sabah continued to enjoy royalty from the production of oil and gas offshore Sabah. In the last six years, there have been discoveries of oil and gas, particularly in the deepwaters off Sabah. The first major development of this new discovery of oil is Kikeh which came into production in August last year. With that production, Sabah's royalty value went up. The reserves of gas offshore Sabah are small, about 10 trillion cubic feet, and they are scattered in reservoirs that are not very large. This is different from the reservoirs in Sarawak and Peninsular Malaysia which contain huge reserves. Because they are small and scattered, the viability of developing the oil and gas is quite limited until such time when we discover sufficient volume to develop. So what we came up with is this: The development of offshore Sabah gas is going to be undertaken in two clusters -- the northern and southern clusters. What the clusters mean is that there will be a central facility which will gather the gas from various reservoirs and it will be brought to Sabah. So you have two big pipelines coming in from the north and south. And they will end up in Kimanis at the Sabah Oil and Gas Terminal (SOGT). That is for gas. The future development of oil that has been discovered, starting with the Gumusut development, which is ultra deep, will also be landed in Kimanis. There will be crude oil tanks with a capacity for three billion barrels and the oil will be exported from there. Hence, the combined Kimanis facility will be called the SOGT. It took us 30 years to develop Bintulu which is today one of the single largest liquefied natural gas (LNG) complexes in the world. It has taken us 35 years to develop Kerteh. In order for gas to be developed, there has to be a base load to make it commercially viable. In the case of Peninsular Malaysia, the base load was provided by the export to Singapore. Only when you have this base load can downstream gas industries proceed. We are bringing gas from offshore Sabah to onshore Sabah. A portion of it, as we design this, will be piped to Bintulu. That gives us the base to provide the economic viability to develop the gas offshore Sabah. Bear in mind that the gas reserves are not all Petronas' but they also belong to production-sharing contractors who would only develop it if there is economic return.
Q: When did discussion with the Sabah government on the petrochemical plant begin?
A: The first discussion was in 2006 when the whole concept was deliberated. At that discussion, we (Petronas) said we will embark on a masterplan for downstream gas industries which would include petrochemicals. In fact, we conducted a joint feasibility study with Yayasan Sabah for a world-scale fertiliser plant or urea plant. But it was not commercially viable because the cost of construction was very high. We have not given up and we will revisit the proposed project when the cost and market environment changes. In the meantime, we are in the process of completing the integrated petrochemical masterplan which will then be presented to the state government when it is ready. To have a downstream integrated petrochemical complex also requires a lot of other things such as infrastructure -- meaning not only roads but also marine facilities and water. For example, in Kerteh, we use 30 million gallons of water every day. We also need power and human resources. All these need to be taken into account if we are going to attract world-class companies. This is a global business. We need to attract and bring in the "big boys" as partners. We have not been keeping quiet. We have held discussions with key petrochemical companies and identified potential sites. We have been very quiet about this because we don't want any speculation, especially where land is concerned. We are in a competitive global business environment. If you make an announcement prematurely about what project you want to embark on, you will be alerting the competitors who can then be ahead of you. The industry is such that you cannot build little plants here and there. It is not viable. That is why all the facilities we have built are of world-scale capacities.
Q: Can you elaborate on what the SOGT entails?
A: As part of the development of the SOGT, the immediate thing that has happened is the joint venture between the state government and Wah Seong Corp Bhd which is a listed company operating pipe welding and coating plant in KKIP (Kota Kinabalu Industrial Park) which employs 250 Sabahans. The plant is not built just for the SOGT but also for other projects in Malaysia and outside Malaysia. We are also training close to 500 Sabahans in various skills and not just for this development. But again, the expectation of the oil and gas industry as a large provider of jobs is also not correct. It is a highly skilled, highly technical job with few vacancies. But the spillover effect for small-and medium-size industries to provide services is huge. We have been in communication with the state government to encourage Sabahans in this. What is important is that this is a long-term industry and we have to look at the success of the Sarawak service providers because they have been very focused. They have been able to look at the long-term to the extent that they have been able to export their services. If the expectation is for all this to happen overnight, it is wrong. Another key consideration is when we talk about having a gas-based industry, any investor who wants to invest in a petrochemical facility will want to see the sustainability of production and reserves for at least 20 years. You do not invest billions of dollars and find that there is no gas after six or seven years. As the gas owner, you have to give that commitment that you will be able to provide the resource for at least 20 years.
Q: How long will Sabah be able to produce gas?
A: The offshore Sabah resources compared with Sarawak and the peninsula is very small. Sarawak's gas reserve is 45 trillion cubic feet and in the peninsula, it is about 39 trillion. Sabah has about 10 trillion to 12 trillion, if you include associated gas, and it is scattered and in small reservoirs making it expensive to develop. The important thing is developing the gas the way we have conceptualised and planned to help maximise value to the state government because the state will receive royalty from the gas production.
Q: Is the setting up of the proposed petrochemical plant in Sabah something new?
A: It has been ongoing and the methanol plant in Labuan is also a petrochemical plant. Many competent and capable Sabahans are actually located in Labuan where they are the service providers. The chief minister (Datuk Seri Musa Aman) and some state officials visited Kerteh in 2006 to see the operation there.
Q: Some Sabah leaders want a gas plant to be set up in the state, instead of spending RM1.6 billion to build the gas pipeline to Bintulu.
A: The proposal was considered but it was not viable because we cannot sustain it for 30 years. In the end, if you look at it in the national context, we will be wasting resources because we already have a complex in Bintulu. The reason we are sending the gas to Bintulu is because of the base. The cost of an LNG plant today is about US$1,200 (RM4,224) per tonne. The third plant in Bintulu which was completed in 2002 cost US$200 a tonne.
Q: Does this mean that the only option is to send the gas to Bintulu?
A: Yes, but we will still pay Sabah the royalty. We don't plan to take everything to Bintulu. We keep a certain amount to support the downstream gas industry in Sabah. This will provide the base to develop the resources.
Q: When do you expect the masterplan on the proposed petrochemical complex in Sabah and the urea plant to be completed?
A: By early next year we will be able to complete the petrochemical masterplan. As for now, the urea plant is out because the cost is too high.
Q: What about the proposed gas-powered plant that is to be built in Sabah?
A: Petronas Gas Bhd has already entered into a joint venture with Yayasan Sabah for a 300 megawatt combined cycle power plant in Kimanis. It should be fully on stream in early 2011, which is when the gas is expected to land. We have a joint committee chaired by the state secretary to oversee this.
Q: The public has the impression that the state government had not been playing an active or participatory role in the project.
A: Like I said, you cannot make a premature announcement on a project like this.
Q: What is the overall investment required for the petrochemical complex in Sabah?
A: Kertih's was RM70 billion. As for Sabah, developing the two gas clusters and the Gumusut field has already exceeded RM10 billion. Gumusut, which is being developed by Petronas, Shell Production Sharing Contractors and Conoco, is expected to start producing in 2011. We are working with the various training institutions in Sabah to train Sabahans.
Q: Some Sabah politicians are saying the gas belongs to Sabah and as such it must benefit the state.
A: I think this is a national resource. You cannot look at it in a parochial way. The focus should be on all the supporting industries. We have explained to the trade and business chambers in Sabah on many occasions that there will be many opportunities for them. When we talk of certain packages of contracts, we restrict it to Sabah contractors. For example, the site preparation work for the SOGT in Kimanis involves two Sabah Bumiputera contractors and the value of the contract is RM100 million. One consortium gets RM60 million and the other RM40 million. The first consortium is led by Montis and the other is Ribuan Gaya. The supply and coating of pipes is worth RM400 million, and it is a 60 per cent joint venture with the state government. The company is Petropaip Sabah Sdn Bhd.
Q: Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Tan Sri Bernard Dompok had said that he was disappointed that the state government was not supporting his objection to the pipeline on grounds that the gas was most needed in Sabah. What is your view on this?
A: To be fair to the state, they know more about what had transpired. But we did not want to have a premature announcement. We are only a small reserve holder compared with Iran, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. If we make too much noise, what happens if the Saudis say they want to do the plant first? You are in competition as a resource holder to attract the right investor to come into a joint venture with you. The competition from Indonesia, Thailand and Singapore that I went through to get Dow and BASF to come to Kertih and Kuantan was tremendous. We were on the same flight to New York with the chairman of EDB (Economic Development Board of Singapore) and we were going to see the same investor.
Q: Are you saying it is unfair for certain quarters to say the state government was hardly involved in the project?
A: What I can say is that they have been fully involved since 2006 when we presented and discussed the concept with them. Like I said, I am not a politician but a technocrat. I can give you facts, the history and how we've done it.
Q: Is it fair to say then that in the case of the state government, the chief minister was aggressively involved in the petrochemical plant project, contrary to the perception that has been created?
A: Yes. I think it is fair comment. And also together with him we even discussed this with the national leaders, both the prime minister and his deputy since 2006.
Q: In the Sabah Development Corridor (SDC), one of the core focus is the development of an oil and gas industry in Sabah. Can you elaborate?
A: That is how it got lifted and included as part of the corridor's development. Not the other way around. Even before 1995, when we landed gas in Kg Gayang (Tuaran), for many years nobody used the gas. The independent power producer only used 20 per cent of the capacity that we landed.
Q: Sabah is facing an energy shortage and following the proposal to build a coal-fired power plant in the east coast, there is talk of using gas to produce electricity.
A: This (gas-powered electricity plant) is in our discussions with Tenaga Nasional. You cannot just land (the gas) here, there and everywhere. We are continuously discussing with Tenaga Nasional their requirements. I have always believed that Borneo should have its own power grid instead of having small power plants here and there. It makes economic sense.
Q: The published cost for the gas pipeline is RM1.6 billion but some politicians in Sabah think it will be RM3 billion.
A: The EPCC (Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Commissioning) cost of the gas pipeline is RM1.6 billion. One of the members of the consortium is a Yayasan Sabah company, Petrosab. The others are India-based Punj Lloyd and Dialog E&C Sdn Bhd.
Q: Although you have outlined the reasons, the lingering feeling will still be why not a LNG plant in Sabah?
A: The Kertih plant was not cheap because you are talking about reactors. An urea plant today will cost a fortune. And all these products have a global market and the price will be determined accordingly. So when you do a feasibility study you are not only doing the technical feasibility study but also looking at the market, the future price.
Q: It is left to Sabah then to get a better deal in some other way, perhaps higher royalty?
A: That is not for me to comment.
Q: Another grouse of Sabah leaders is that Petronas has hundreds of subsidiaries and yet Sabahans are not benefiting in the form of directorships, etc.
A: Sabahans have got quite a number of our scholarships. And all these training is funded by us.
- nst
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Watchmen 2009
Friday, November 14, 2008
Bernama SMS 14/11/08 (2)
Bernama SMS 14/11/08
Thursday, November 13, 2008
MalaysiaKini SMS 13/11/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 13/11/08
Power Blackout 8
MalaysiaKini SMS 13/11/08
Bernama SMS 13/11/08 (2)
Bernama SMS 13/11/08
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Regarding Power Blackout 7
We are no longer bothered to call and lodge a complain with SESB...what's the point? They cannot do much anyway. They'd just tell us to switch off the power points and lights in the house. (We've done that; nada and zilch still pitch black)
So what are we doing now?
Wait lor...
Power Blackout 7
MalaysiaKini SMS 12/11/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 12/11/08 (2)
Bernama SMS 12/11/08
MalaysiaKini SMS 12/11/08
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Power Blackout 6
MalaysiaKini SMS 11/11/08 (2)
SMS Joke Just In...
CONSUL: Ur name, please?
ARAB: Abdul Aziz.
CONSUL: Sex?
ARAB: 3 times a day.
CONSUL: I mean, male or female?
ARAB: Both male n female.Sometimes even with camel.
CONSUL: Holy cow!
ARAB: Yes, cows n dogs, too.
CONSUL: Man, isn't dat hostile?
ARAB: Horse style, dog style, any style!
CONSUL: Oh dear!
ARAB: Deer? No deer! They run very fast !
MalaysiaKini SMS 11/11/08
Monday, November 10, 2008
Recent SMS Just In...
I wonder what would they think of next?
........................................................................
Doakan keadilan dan pembebasan bagi REV. FR. PAULINO MIRANDA, PADERI PAROKI GEREJA DIVINE MERCY SHAH ALAM, yg DI TANGKAP oleh Polis sebentar tadi dlm perarakan Candle Light menentang ISA, di Padang Amcorp Mall PJ. Sebarkan pada warga Katolik. Thanks.
MalaysiaKini SMS 10/11/08 (4)
MalaysiaKini SMS 10/11/08 (3)
MalaysiaKini SMS 10/11/08 (2)
MalaysiaKini SMS 10/11/08
Power Blackout 5
Thank goodness with my Nokia E71 that I can still blog.
........................................
The power came back on at 10:45 PM
Yahoo? Maybe. Anyway